Which scenario is least likely to lead to intra-organizational conflict?

Which scenario is least likely to lead to intra-organizational conflict?

• A. Disagreement between teams over resource allocation
• B. Competitive tensions due to market positioning
• C. Conflicting instructions from leadership
• D. Cross-functional team collaboration

Answer: (D)

Cross-functional team collaboration is least likely to lead to intra-organizational conflict because this approach usually fosters cooperation, communication, and alignment among different teams or departments. When members from various functions collaborate, they often share different perspectives and expertise, which can lead to more innovative solutions and a collective focus on common goals. This collaboration encourages teamwork and can enhance understanding, reducing the potential for conflict. In contrast, the other scenarios often introduce competitive dynamics or misalignments that are more prone to create friction. For instance, disagreements over resource allocation can generate rivalries as different teams vie for limited resources. Competitive tensions due to market positioning can exacerbate conflicts if teams feel threatened by one another's strategies. Lastly, conflicting instructions from leadership may create confusion and tension, as team members struggle to prioritize tasks or align their efforts.

Cross-functional team collaboration is least likely to lead to intra-organizational conflict because this approach usually fosters cooperation, communication, and alignment among different teams or departments. When members from various functions collaborate, they often share different perspectives and expertise, which can lead to more innovative solutions and a collective focus on common goals. This collaboration encourages teamwork and can enhance understanding, reducing the potential for conflict.

In contrast, the other scenarios often introduce competitive dynamics or misalignments that are more prone to create friction. For instance, disagreements over resource allocation can generate rivalries as different teams vie for limited resources. Competitive tensions due to market positioning can exacerbate conflicts if teams feel threatened by one another's strategies. Lastly, conflicting instructions from leadership may create confusion and tension, as team members struggle to prioritize tasks or align their efforts.